[OH6KZP]

Gregor, the map insert on the area-specific pages of the Protected Planet website https://www.protectedplanet.net/en (with the WDPA stuff) appears to crash every now and again, resulting in the behavior you explained.

I have been in contact with UNEP-WCMC who manages the Protected Planet website many times and informed them about the bug. The situation always gets fixed, but it also tends to reoccur, so they appear to have an unresolved bug that resurfaces from time to time.

[OH6KZP]

Luk wrote: “Also Topoperators does not include worked Deleted Areas in the search.”

That is not correct. As I reported from my OHFF-based research this February, the deleted areas ARE included in both activator/hunter totals when looking at the program-wise Top Operators view. However, in other places there appears to be non-alignment regarding how they are handled, as listed below.

——————-
Question: Are deleted parks included in the statistics totals?

Activators
——————–
Program-wise top operators listing: YES
Personal view (OHFF-A in “National awards”): YES
GCR e-mail for award application: YES
Award application threshold: NO

Hunters
——————–
Program-wise top operators listing: YES
Personal view (OHFF-H in “National awards”): NO
GCR e-mail for award application: YES
Award application threshold: ?

[OH6KZP]

I did some research on this for an OHFF-related issue in February and reported this to Logsearch admin.

There is some non-alignment, as detailed below.
—-

Q: Are deleted parks included in the statistics totals?

Activators
——————–
Program-wise top operators listing: YES
Personal view (OHFF-A in “National awards”): YES
GCR e-mail for award application: YES
Award application threshold: NO

Hunters
——————–
Program-wise top operators listing: YES
Personal view (OHFF-H in “National awards”): NO
GCR e-mail for award application: YES
Award application threshold: ?

[Author]

Posts