Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
just to be sure, these entries means
20140827 0908 DL5HXX Remove, already corrected SMFF-2417
20140827 0936 IK2SY1 Remove, already corrected SMFF-2417QSO needs to be deleted, right?
Manfredjust to be sure, these entries means
20140827 0908 DL5HXX Remove, already corrected SMFF-2417
20140827 0936 IK2SY1 Remove, already corrected SMFF-2417QSO needs to be deleted, right?
ManfredHi, the 36 records out of log-id 54326 were moved to the new date.
strange were post was gone, as normally i am the only one who does the corrections and I didn´t delete.
anyhow, solved now
73, Manfred DF6EXHi Bob, the around 25 contacts were moved from 16.. to 20..,
after this the resulting 5 contacts were changed from 40 to 20 meter.
Please tell him, he should take care a bit more on the content of the log.
Lot of activators believe it´s important to send the log very fast, however most important is to send it correct.
In a log with around 40/50 contacts an error-quote of almost 50 percent is a bit high.
(just my private comment)
happy easter
Manfred DF6EXHi, the reason is that two different uploaders loaded the same contacts.
So there were following logs uploaded
#53220 by N1TYH for KFF-3180 with 19 contacts
#53216 by N1TYH for KFF-3190 with 16 contacts
#53218 by N1TYH for KFF-3208 with 2 contacts
#53216 by N1TYH for KFF-3188 with 30 contacts
#53219 by N1TYH for KFF-3270 with 12 contactshowever just before those uploads a log called N7AME@KFF-Various (#53212) was uploaded by NU0C with 79 contacts
The 79 contacts of log 53212 were now set to deleted so statistics should be updated over night.
Uploaders should clearly specify what area the are uploading, cause the dupe-check is only working for the file-name, if the log has a total different name (like here KFF-various) it allows the dupe-upload.
73, Manfred DF6EX
