Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hi Bob, the around 25 contacts were moved from 16.. to 20..,
after this the resulting 5 contacts were changed from 40 to 20 meter.
Please tell him, he should take care a bit more on the content of the log.
Lot of activators believe it´s important to send the log very fast, however most important is to send it correct.
In a log with around 40/50 contacts an error-quote of almost 50 percent is a bit high.
(just my private comment)
happy easter
Manfred DF6EXHi, the reason is that two different uploaders loaded the same contacts.
So there were following logs uploaded
#53220 by N1TYH for KFF-3180 with 19 contacts
#53216 by N1TYH for KFF-3190 with 16 contacts
#53218 by N1TYH for KFF-3208 with 2 contacts
#53216 by N1TYH for KFF-3188 with 30 contacts
#53219 by N1TYH for KFF-3270 with 12 contactshowever just before those uploads a log called N7AME@KFF-Various (#53212) was uploaded by NU0C with 79 contacts
The 79 contacts of log 53212 were now set to deleted so statistics should be updated over night.
Uploaders should clearly specify what area the are uploading, cause the dupe-check is only working for the file-name, if the log has a total different name (like here KFF-various) it allows the dupe-upload.
73, Manfred DF6EXok, the LZFF-0321-record was marked as deleted and the LZFF-0335 QSO remains as valid in DB.
73, Manfred DF6EXyes the log is uploaded, please send your request next time directly to the french-manager,
73, Manfred DF6EXcan you send me an info, that I can finally close this task?
Manfred DF6EXsee here:
Hello, there are two records in your log were you claim that OT4V/p has worked you in the same minute from LZFF-0335 and LZFF-0321, thats for sure not possible, because think you cannot be the same time in two references. Please clear this issue with OT4V/p, what was the correct contact.
