[Manfred Meier]

there is only a log with station call VE9GLF, station base call VE9GLF and op.call VE9GLF, is that correct at all of shouldn´t it be VE9MY as station call?
If there are some calls with wrong operator let me know which contacts, then I will update.

[Manfred Meier]

done

[Manfred Meier]

siehe wff-dl.de, dies muss bei dl2vfr beantragt werden

[Manfred Meier]

done

[Manfred Meier]

done

[Manfred Meier]

done

[Manfred Meier]

there is already JAFF-0072 in the log

[Manfred Meier]

done

[Manfred Meier]

done

[Manfred Meier]

done

[Manfred Meier]

is there any update ???????

[Manfred Meier]

there is a log from EA1IYN from EAFF-0082 in the system, if you look at EAFF-0082 you find

EAFF-0082
2021-05-25 EA1IYN 281 273

there is also a log for EAFF-1282
EAFF-1282
2021-05-28 EA1IYN 318 313

so apparently they are correct inside, if you go to activities from EA1IYN you will find

1 EAFF-0082 EU / EA Parque Natural Dunas de Liencres EA1IYN 2021-05-25 281 273 –
2 EAFF-0084 EU / EA Parque Natural de Oyambre EA1IYN 2021-05-18 303 296 –
3 EAFF-0086 EU / EA Parque Natural de las Marismas de Santoña, Victor … EA1IYN 2021-05-19 221 219 –
4 EAFF-1017 EU / EA SAC LIC-Cueva de Rogeria EA1IYN 2021-05-31 257 253 –
5 EAFF-1282 EU / EA SAC LIC-Río Pas EA1IYN 2021-05-28 318 313 –

[Manfred Meier]

stationcall and stationbasecall were updated

[Manfred Meier]

Hi Hans, log was 103022, is changed to laff-0605 (of course later changes has the problem that the P2P contacts doesn´t fit together anymore, just fyi)

[Manfred Meier]

that wouldn-t be a problem Pavel, as the entries in the log has correct date, but anyhow was updated

[Author]

Posts