SP9YFF

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 32 total)
1 2 3
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 6, 2017 at 07:37 in reply to: Extent of the log uploading privilege #6609
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    There are many activators interested to send logs an alternative way 🙂

    Kris

    October 19, 2017 at 04:41 in reply to: onff score counts down? #6408
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    Hi again 🙂

    After six months, it was good to know what the decision was. Will some of our work go to the trash ? 🙁
    This is an important info for activators.
    Again I ask for an official position on this matter.
    Kris

    October 9, 2017 at 05:49 in reply to: Awards by mode #6322
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    Awards by mode for activators:)
    This is a very good idea, many are limited to only one modulation and one or two bands qrv,
    this may result in better activation quality, giving you the ability to do qso for all those in need:)
    k

    June 30, 2017 at 18:38 in reply to: onff score counts down? #5570
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    and what ?

    June 30, 2017 at 18:29 in reply to: WARD-H is not counting QSOs #5569
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    still..

    May 10, 2017 at 06:56 in reply to: onff score counts down? #5088
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    any news for this topics ? decision ?

    May 3, 2017 at 05:25 in reply to: WARD-H is not counting QSOs #4849
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    Not everyone is so lucky 🙂 The qualification of my club continues “0”
    vy73/44 Kris

    April 26, 2017 at 14:12 in reply to: WARD-H is not counting QSOs #4780
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    SP9YFF on table Qualification “0” WARD 2017 ?
    work 2 SPFF-s , up to 400 qso-s , log ok into database

    April 26, 2017 at 14:06 in reply to: onff score counts down? #4779
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    This is one of stupid rules.
    It’s very wrong to remove the work done by the activator,
    it invested time and money to activate.
    If the Government removes the protected area should have a status of “deleted” like as in the DXCC program “DELETED ENTITIES”.
    Crediting for the activator and hunting should be up to the date of deletion.
    Kris

    February 21, 2017 at 19:06 in reply to: WWFF LOG/REF. ?? vs.SPFF database #4330
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    jan 3 2k17 https://wwff.co/hny-from-logsearch/
    SPFF update (91 st.) ref SPFF-1362 to SPFF-1452 🙂

    February 21, 2017 at 17:50 in reply to: WWFF LOG/REF. ?? vs.SPFF database #4329
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    Alena – are you sure and seriously think that the 3 problem is on the side SP coordinators and ref.manager ?

    February 21, 2017 at 10:28 in reply to: Missing WWFF #4322
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    new at first day of january 2k17 SPFF-s also disappeared 🙁
    look https://wwff.co/forums/topic/wwff-logref-vs-spff-database/
    Kris sp9upk

    November 22, 2016 at 07:08 in reply to: NEW www address current SPFF #2861
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    Quotes and translators from http://spff.suchacz.eu:
    New address
    I draw attention to the NEW address of the current page SPFF:
    http://spff.suchacz.eu
    During her run on the new server, thank you very much Slawek, SP4EOO.
    44 de sp2fap
    SP2FAP on 11.14.2016

    November 14, 2016 at 18:37 in reply to: New rules, bad news? #2776
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    HI All 🙂
    You could add something about the election and duties of coordinators and log-managers, and the Committee, as they select, which period, what conditions should meet, or you can cancel, change, etc. .

    November 10, 2016 at 18:11 in reply to: New rules, bad news? #2712
    SP9YFF
    Participant

    Activations durning a time of no propagation ,-the problem is to perform 100 qso.
    Requirement and 200 from the club she works one operator is ridiculous.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 32 total)
1 2 3
Translate »
×