Forum Replies Created
September 28, 2020 at 22:51 in reply to: Broken Callsign Thread #10643
Thank you, Andrew!September 18, 2020 at 14:09 in reply to: Broken Callsign Thread #10602
11914941 2018-09-10 RI0B RFF-0015 20m/SSB 1R4AZ — R4AZ is correct
12635253 2019-04-19 UA3LDU/P RFF-0487 20m/CW 1RM6J — RM6J is correct
November 20, 2019 at 05:00 in reply to: Wrong date in log #9975
- This reply was modified 2 years, 6 months ago by RN3ANT.
- This reply was modified 2 years, 6 months ago by Andrew M0YMA.
Perhaps, would it be better to upload correct log and forget for wrong one?September 24, 2019 at 19:24 in reply to: No results available #9873
I’ve tried again just now. It already works!
Thank you very much!September 23, 2019 at 20:08 in reply to: No results available #9870
There is similar situation.
73! RN3ANTAugust 19, 2019 at 11:52 in reply to: Wrong reference #9806
If there are some difficulties to correct these three logs, you can simply delete them. And we will upload them again with the correct reference.
Vit, RN3ANTOctober 3, 2018 at 08:14 in reply to: WWFF web site maintenance #8918
Nineteenth day… Perplexity… No one understands what is going on.October 3, 2018 at 08:12 in reply to: Wrong band data in RFF-0481 log #8917
Ninth day… Perplexity… No one understands what is going on.September 24, 2018 at 18:47 in reply to: Wrong band data in RFF-0481 log #8865
No, they are not. There are some QSO on 20m, part on 40m, and there are QSO on 30m. It needs to change the band for 40 of 88 QSO.
This will fix 2 P2P QSO at once and possibly find the third P2P QSO.
73! VitSeptember 14, 2018 at 23:10 in reply to: WWFF web site maintenance #8797
The lack of response instills qualm. There is no response to the email for 10 days, there is no answer to this post already third day.
It seems that nobody is maintaining the “NATIONAL AWARDS” Section in particular or even the site in general.
I understand that everyone has a lot of own cases besides the WWFF. But can you answer at least by a couple of words?
Guys, if no one wants to do it, so maybe I’ll do it myself for a few minutes?
73! Vit, RN3ANT
August 10, 2018 at 20:24 in reply to: Park to Park Award query #8567
- This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by RN3ANT.
A P2P will confirm even if it is the only QSO of the activation
I dare to object: not always.
Recently, I revised my QSOs, several times it happens so my activation is credited, the activation of the correspondent is also credited. But our P2P is not credited. In this case, I already have credited P2P with other activators during exactly this activation. Perhaps somewhen, if time permits, I will make a summary for you, Andrew, on these P2P and other incomprehensible things with Log Search.
Now this is not the most important for me.
73! Vit, RN3ANTJuly 18, 2018 at 03:33 in reply to: DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR FROM EU OPS #8396
This is already an evolving trend.
Or maybe this is an epidemic of some still unknown European disease that spreads through the air. Not only beginners, but also highly experienced, solid operators began to become infected with it.
73! Vit, RN3ANTFebruary 15, 2018 at 16:22 in reply to: The way we apply for global awards… #7929
There is such a thing – usability. It’s awful here.
Hello, Pit ))
Thank you very much! These files are exactly what I want.
And this mailbox is uncorked by your very first letter. LOOOL
We created these mailboxes one or two weeks ago, practically nobody knows about them. I check them once a day or two days.
73! Vit, RN3ANT
Thank you, Danny.
Pit is silent. It looks like no one has a vector logo.
It is so pity.
I have already downloaded all three PNG from the site.
73 & 44! Vit, RN3ANT