Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
EA3HKYParticipant
The EAFF team no longer exists.
Maybe if instead of advising this kind of thing, had made the changes in log errors, the EAFF team would still followEA3HKYParticipantHello Mill, the WWFF leaders have already taken letters on the matter, on January 21, 2017 I wrote …
“It will stop uploading photos and videos of activities.
The EAFF will continue to operate under minimal degree, will continue taking comprehensive control of each and every one of the activities but internally, with the sole purpose of transferring all that information to a possible new coordinator EAFF. From the day February 1, 2017 we continue validating activities based on the photos and / or videos provided but such photos and / or videos will not be published. The logs will still be up to the international web of WWFF.”They have decided the following:
“Starting from 1 February the EAFF web will close down. All further EAFF logs should be addressed to WWFF Operations Approval Manager df6ex@winqsl.de, until a new EAFF co-ordinator is installed.”
https://wwff.co/vacancy-eaff-co-ordinator/
73
EA3HKY-CasianoEA3HKYParticipantWe detail the timetable for closure EAFF diploma.
Starting on February 1st, 2017 substantial changes will occur in the EAFF website and the Facebook page EAFF.
On the website of EAFF the following changes will occur:
The utility from which ads upcoming activities will stop functioning are published.
They shall cease to make publications regarding the activities approved and unapproved.
It will stop updating the list of activities valid, invalid and false.
He will no longer approve new user registrations on the website of EAFF.
On the Facebook page the following change will occur:It will stop uploading photos and videos of activities.
The EAFF will continue to operate under minimal degree, will continue taking comprehensive control of each and every one of the activities but internally, with the sole purpose of transferring all that information to a possible new coordinator EAFF. From the day February 1, 2017 we continue validating activities based on the photos and / or videos provided but such photos and / or videos will not be published. The logs will still be up to the international web of WWFF.Day 1 March 2017 diplomas WWFF-EAFF program will no longer be continued since that date will no longer be possible to request them from WWFF logsearch.
The EAFF Extra diplomas also no longer be available for hunters and will be available only expedition.
Diploma EAFF.
EA3HKYParticipantIn the hypothetical case that there is no candidate, both EA8CER-Fran, and I (both EAFF coordinators) will cease our position as much on June 27, 2017
EA3HKYParticipanthttp://eaff.mikedeltavictor.com/dudas-comunes/
http://eaff.mikedeltavictor.com/videotutoriales/
- This reply was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by EA3HKY.
EA3HKYParticipantHi, Danny.
I share your opinion about making the maximum number of QSO, in our activities, we do about 400 QSO, but because we think that the spirit of the WWFF (EAFF in my case) diploma is to give everyone the maximum opportunity to work on that reference And consequently give all the maximum opportunities to have a contact / reference more to obtain diplomas.
But your way of operating and mine are not the only ones, and the rules (in my point of view) are to guarantee a minimum, if the minimum is 44 QSO and there is no minimum of time, because I guarantee that there will be some Only 44 QSO.
I see that every day the WWFF diploma tends to resemble the SOTA diploma, I think it’s a serious mistake.
How would you feel that on December 1, 2016 I would do an EAFF activity whose reference had never been activated and only made the first 44 and more powerful hunters? I think you would not like it very much.
Standards should avoid bad habits, not encourage them.
With respect to the radioclubs I totally agree with SP9YFF, the QSO minimum should be set at 44 by the number of operators that have intervened.73 + 44
EA3HKY-Casiano- This reply was modified 8 years ago by EA3HKY.
EA3HKYParticipantHello everyone
EAFF diplomas are not sent by email.
An email is sent stating that the diploma has been approved and indicating a URL where you can download the diploma in pdf.
On November 4, 2016 (the day you applied for the diploma), the following message was sent to you:
**************************************************
Congratulations!, your EAFF award has been approved.
You can download your award from the URL EAFF http://eaff.mikedeltavictor.com/diplomas-cazador/
Finally just left me thank you for your participation in the EAFF award.73+44
The EAFF award Team
http://eaff.mikedeltavictor.com/
https://www.facebook.com/diplomaeaff/**************************************************
At EAFF we are not aware that the email has not been delivered, since we have not received any undelivered email notification, so we assume that you received the email.
Neither have we received any email on your part interested in the diploma not received.73 + 44
EA3HKY-Casiano
EAFF CoordinatorEA3HKYParticipantNo
In the area of the web where different national diplomas are requested.
Ex LogSearch “program & awards”
Currently LogSearch “National awards”http://subefotos.com/ver/?9df95b59558388662cb9b792966a611ao.png
EA3HKYParticipantHello Andrew.
However the first email (as requested diploma) if you put the name, I deduce that in this case the name “First Name” field takes the user registration.
You can not aim in confirmation emails to the same field?
In this way regardless if your profile is good or misconfigured will be indistinct.
Also avoid other unwanted problems
EA3HKYParticipantHi Danny and Andrew.
Andrew, the “error” is in the area of National Awards.
Danny, with wordpress can fix it in 2 ways
HTML mode (HTML tab) modified the code manually.
Visual mode, (Visual tab) you wear over and modified the URL text and its properties (acerca blank)
EA3HKYParticipantHi Danny.
The URL itself are correct.
The HTML code is incorrect and therefore not open links
Right now the in the EAFF link puts
<a href="http://eaff.mikedeltavictor.com/ target="_blank'=""></a>
Correct code is:
<a href="http://eaff.mikedeltavictor.com/" target="_blank"></a>
In Firefox 49.0.1 the link does not work. Please check the HTML code of all links
EA3HKYParticipantHi Ron.
I have sent the .csv file by emailEA3HKYParticipantHi Danny
“http://eaff.mikedeltavictor.com target =” is not correct
“http://eaff.mikedeltavictor.com” target=”_blank” is correct -
AuthorPosts