Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Please see the news article posted on 6th March
Effective from that date, WWFF-H hunter awards are issued:
* Entry level at 10 references worked or points earned (unchanged)
* Between 44 and 444, in steps of 44 (unchanged)
* Between 444 and 4444, in steps of 100 (unchanged)
* Between 4,444 and 8,444, in steps of 200
* Above 8,444, in steps of 400You have the 14,444 award – your next award will be 14,844
The roll-over text on the WWFF-H award needs correcting…
Hi Peter
My guess is that the server was busy doing the “overnight” (UK-time) magic…
The simple solution is to upload the remaining QSOs using a slightly renamed log-file
Thanks for posting… it seems there is a concerted effort to draw this to our attention, given the large number of emails, messages etc received.
I’ve checked, and the references listed were created in late 2014… so it has taken people nearly 10 years to spot.
However, given that WWFF operates in accordance with ITU principles, these references should not have been approved, and as such have been removed (retrospectively)
@Paul – the upload checks catch obvious errors in the ADIF, but cannot trap (eg) wrong date(s), wrong activated reference(s), wrong station/operator callsign(s)…
I fully accept that a Log Manager ius unlikely to detect the various wrong bands, wrong hunter references, wrong hunter callsigns…
Fundamentally, activators need to be more careful in their logging!
I’m sorry you feel that way, KI6BTY…
On the other hand, a quick look in the Log Corrections sub-forum will show the number of errors that get uploaded after being checked by the Log Manager.
Various improvements are on the drawing board, but are mostly constrained by the simple fact that I don’t have the spare time, and other volunteers are few (while acknowledging the few that are assisting!).
Hi Augusto
Logsearch simply processes the data it has… if there are activations showing the wrong year, that suggests that the QSO date is incorrect…
Perhaps HB9CBR can look at his “2010” activations and tell us when they actually were?
Please advise the required changes… it’s easier than deleting, especially when Hunters have already claimed the point
Thanks Gerald…
Sometimes things are so obvious, you see right through them -especially when it was you writing it in the first place.
This has now been fixed 🙂
Hi Rahul
For reasons I don’t understand, the profile checks were not passing for you…
So I’ve fixed it for you…
