Forum Replies Created
About your reply to me #13902,
I have replied here, I guess, but I cannot find anything more.
I’m sorry for that; as I have no copy of what I wrote to you I cannot copy here my reply.
I hope you have got it by mail, anyway it was that logs are corrected as uploaded these times, and WWFF seems to have all them right; but the statistics does not reflect these data.
It’s not so important, we have checked and now we are clear.
The all years awards we believe to be right, and our yearly top ops will be issued based on our logs.
Many thanks, Andrew, let me please have a valid email for you as the one of my previous messages re HB9 did come back with invalid address.
Ciao 73 44, Augusto
Hello Luk, thanks!
I have inbetween compared my logs results and done some more work with LogSearch.
– We have NO HBFF Activ. logs on 2010
– WWFF has NO HBFF Logs on 2010
– TOP OPS Gives many, absolutely wrong, for 2010 (fake logs!)
– We have 3 Activators on 2011
– WWFF has the same logs as us for 2011
– TOP OPS gives 1 activator only for 2011 (are the right logs!)
I have not yet tested for other years, but what is clear is that the WWFF DataBase has the right data, and only the results of these statistics are wrong.
For this I suppose that all the Activator awards are rights.
For Hunters, as in 2010 we had NO activations at all, is clear that also Top Hunter 2010 may not be correct.
For the same reason of errors in 2011 above maybe also 2011.
I have decided to issue our Top Awards based only on Log Data, that are the same in WWFF and HBFF , in spite of statistics.
Many thanks, Luk
73 44 Augusto
Il 26/09/2023 10:24, Luc Waterschoot ha scritto:
I have checked the logs I did upload these times: all is correct.
Thus the Top Operator statistic for 2010 is completely wrong.
Probably also for the hunters, as we had no activations in 2010 at all.
For 2011, the only activations are by I2AE and this is also wrong as we had alo 1 activation by DL1EKO and 2 activations on the same Ref by HB9WFF.
For this reason we believe that also the “all years” statistics may be wrong! And for this, also some Award may have been issued wrongly.
I also checked the refs activated by those activators, with LogSearch: strangely, it gives correct results for 2011.
I would please the concerned manager to correct these pages, and write mere if the other years statistics are corrected, so we may issue the top operators yearly awards.
Augusto HB9TZA WWFF HBFF NCAugust 18, 2023 at 16:50 in reply to: GMA Log Error #00148907 2023-07-20 HBFF-0308 HB9AGO/P #13766
Habsruedi HB9AGO wrote me that the wrong Log in HBFF-0308 is still there and the right activation in HBFF-0259 is not in the Database.
I guess it can be erased the wrong log in HBFF-0308; in that case I could upload again the right log in the HBFF-0259; let me pleaese know if I can do that.
Many thanks fronm Augusto HB9TZA and Hansruedi HB9AGO
HB9AGP wrote: WWFF hat den Fehler bei HBFF-0259 vom 20.07.2023 noch nicht korrigiert. Meine Aktivität vom Schauenberg, HBFF-0259, wurde wegen dem Fehler im GMA-Adif-File bei HBFF-0308 gutgeschrieben. Darf ich Dich bitten, diesen Fehler bei WWFF korrigieren zu lassen.Vielen Dank.
Something has changed on the HBFF National Program: in the page of the National Awards,
under the icon of HBFF stand:
… <omissis> …
Logmanager : HB9TZA
Here the email address of HB9TZA now is ” email@example.com ” to be changed with the new one: ” firstname.lastname@example.org ” or better temporary both together ” email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org .
The structure of the site and of HBFF is changing as the Castles part will be token over and managed indipendently by another ham group.
I thank you very much! 73 44,
Anyway Andrew, tradition or not, I see that some few operators care for it; I guess in the next edition of the HBFF Rules I will erase that tradition, ans let it be as it comes.
Personally I let free all the References I propose and find; to be the first or the last for me it is exactly the same thing.
73 44 Andrew, Tnx for the suggestion
as I pointed out, this is not a Rule, it was mandatory only with the old Committee. Now it is just a tradition that we suggest to honorate, it is a question of fair operating among friends, like all OMs should be.
Then, if one will care for this or not, it is only his affair, he’s free to adhere or not to our Traditional Values.
Personally, I would prefer not to have to do with OMs that do not care for rules, do not care for nothing, they come activate and finish, they even do not send logs, or send them elsewhere. Sorrily, exists also that kind of Activator!
I prefer these Ops that BEFORE to come and activate, look for Award Informations, search and read the Rules, look for the maps and Ref Infos, and so on.
Thanks for All, Andrew; 73 44 !
I have changed my email address gmail.com with another new one ***.ch , not ***.com , the former email address gmail.com has been changed on the wwff logsearch admin to the new one, and it worked fine.
The same happened on our server, I changed these .com adresses (gmail and hotmail) with the new one, not .com but .ch , and all is OK.
I do not know why or how, but it works now; and that’s enough.
Thanks to Luk and to Swa for helping me.
Merry Xmas and happy 2023 to all
Augusto HB9TZA / I2JJR ,
WWFF HBFF NC
thanks for your kind posts to me, and for the Infos they contain.
I have posted a reply to my post on the Forum related to this problem.
What I have seen, it seems not only related to gmail but more to .com mail providers. But, careful, allof them, comprised gmail, worked perfectly -in my case – for all the other messages from logsearch admin, except these having GCR in the title!!!
Anyway, I have now added a new email address for me, if I can reach somebody that can add it to the email list of logsearch admin, we will see if what I suppose is true …
Iìll let you know, Swa, what happens and what I find.
73 44, and thanks again also for the Awards Infos.
In the meantime I have notice that other NCs had the same problem; it was suggested that it was related to gmail, but on my case this was more related to ” .com ” as other email accounts did not work; but this is not completely true: both gmasil and other .com worked exactly as they sould do for ALL other messages except the one containing GCR in the title, it seemed. I have not tested it as I cannot write from logsearch admin and send me test messages that way; but from what I have seen, fwiw, it seemed so.
Now I have create a NEW email account of that kind that seemed to be working; I need to let logsearch admin to add that email account to the addresses list of these GCR messages; after that, we will see ehat happens.
Please the persons that may modify these addresses keep in touch with me by personal email so I can give the new address for HBFF-NC and we will stop loosing awards for a silly probably hacking issue on .com or else , whatever it could be!
Many many thanks!
73 44 Augusto
This is now happening to me, too; it is the 1st time.
The strange thing is that ONLY the GCR 1st message does not arrive to me on our server, nor by direct address from logsearch admin.
I tested to add 3 other email addresses to forward the GCR in the server, but nothing: it does not arrive direct nor via the server email forward. Curiously, the email message of approvation and the email message with the awards have the same email addresses, but they arrive and work perfectly.
I cannot figure what may cause this problem, as it is not only a question for one address on the email sent by logsearch admin, as it does not work also on forwarding mail from our server to my adresses! Quite a strange thing.
Do you know what caused these problems to your mail?
Thanks for the Informations.
73 44 , Augusto HB9TZA
HBFF / WWFF-NC
There are a lot of changes to do on HBFF National award on WWFF pages!
I wrongly wrothe them to Andrew, I repeat all of them here following.
1) HBFF Icon has changed: the Icon Owner does not allow me to use it anymore. How may I send you the new Icon? And what dimension and format do you prefer? Thanks.
2) More, the links under that image / Logo have changed: here follow them:
– HBFF Switzerland & Liechtenstein: change link pse!
new link https://hbff.ch/Refs/HBFF_Refs.htm
– Coordinator: as is, OK
– Awards: HB9CBR ; new link: mailto:email@example.com
– Logmanager : as is, OK
The OM that managed the Awards editing them with the data from GCR message and signed them as Award Manager is not anymore with us; the job of issuing the Awards from GCR request messages is now care of Bruno HB9CBR, a vy valid HBFF and SOTA activator, that accepted to help me on this.
I forward you an email message with the new Logo Image and above details: I please you if possible to do the changes in a Hurry to avoid disagreable and odd troubles and problems, thanks!
So we may go forward with the awards, as the old email address is not valid anymore and this could cause loss of requests.
Thank you Luk to help me in this difficult sorrowful situation!
- This reply was modified 1 year ago by HB9TZA. Reason: type corrections
Thank you, 73 44 Augusto
Another DLFF invalid/Not yet valid Reference as in the past:
[ERROR] 20220412:092800 on 40M/CW between HB9BCK/P (HB9BCK) @ HBFF-0139 and DL6MST/P @ DLFF-0063
——> Invalid date 20220412 for reference DLFF-0063;
End of File… 98 of 99 QSOs valid
… please correct logfile then resubmit.
[ERROR] Logfile NOT uploaded
Should I delete the P2P Ref and reload? Thanks