Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hello Kim,
Angelo IK2JTS as I suggested him did edit his profile, and has corrected callsign in parenthesis (!?!) and seems also to have added the ” apply_for_award ” capability as I pointed out.
Now it works finme, he had a lot of Awards to receive.
I sure have received his HBFF-Award request via WWFF, and so all seems OK now. Many thanks, 73 44
AugustoKim please,an Information:
editing the profile, Angelo may change the “capacity” i.e. writing “apply_for_awards” in the capacity line? Or this line may not be edited/changed by the end user? Inbetween I must say that I have not yet understand what Angelo has for capabilities there, as I cannot access that page directly, and he seems not to be able to get there too …
thanks, 73 44 AugustoHello Kim, good morning.
I have opened a ticket with the name and callsign of the affected OM, he tried to check his registration data, but did not find a way to solve that issue. I cannot see his data to check them, so I cannot write that something is wrong there, but I suspect this and not an issue with WWFF . Maybe you may check that and see.
Many thanks Kim for your help, have a good week end
73 44, Augusto HB9TZA / I2JJRMany thanks Manfred,
so no other action by me is required! All is endly OK.
Sorry for the mismatch, Manfred, and thanks for correction.
Please close the topic, thank you.
73 44 AugustoHello Ji DS1TUW,
You may contact Manfred Meier DF6EX, here on WWFF .
He is practically the coordinator for countries that have not yet a National Coordinator and a National Program.
I wish you may want to organize HLFF and may become the WLFF National Coordinator! FB
73 44, Augusto HB9TZA / I2JJROFF TOPICS HERE … Vy SRY .
Hello Andrew,
I am not able to reach you anymore so I hope you read the message here!Please let me have somehow, better by WhatsApp at my cellphone number, the images of these HB9 Paper Logs.
That will make me possible to go forth, otherwise I’m QRX …Please contact me by email to get data and numbers for WhatsApp ot other media, thanks.
Vy 73, Augusto
OFF TOPICS HERE …sry
Andrew, please let me have a valid email address for you, as my last emails to you re HB9/M**** did not get you at all, and we need these answers to go on organizing the activations.
Many thanks, AugustoHello Andrew,
About your reply to me #13902,
I have replied here, I guess, but I cannot find anything more.
I’m sorry for that; as I have no copy of what I wrote to you I cannot copy here my reply.I hope you have got it by mail, anyway it was that logs are corrected as uploaded these times, and WWFF seems to have all them right; but the statistics does not reflect these data.
It’s not so important, we have checked and now we are clear.
The all years awards we believe to be right, and our yearly top ops will be issued based on our logs.
Many thanks, Andrew, let me please have a valid email for you as the one of my previous messages re HB9 did come back with invalid address.
Ciao 73 44, Augusto
Hello Luk, thanks!
I have inbetween compared my logs results and done some more work with LogSearch.The results:
– We have NO HBFF Activ. logs on 2010
– WWFF has NO HBFF Logs on 2010
– TOP OPS Gives many, absolutely wrong, for 2010 (fake logs!)– We have 3 Activators on 2011
– WWFF has the same logs as us for 2011
– TOP OPS gives 1 activator only for 2011 (are the right logs!)I have not yet tested for other years, but what is clear is that the WWFF DataBase has the right data, and only the results of these statistics are wrong.
For this I suppose that all the Activator awards are rights.For Hunters, as in 2010 we had NO activations at all, is clear that also Top Hunter 2010 may not be correct.
For the same reason of errors in 2011 above maybe also 2011.I have decided to issue our Top Awards based only on Log Data, that are the same in WWFF and HBFF , in spite of statistics.
Many thanks, Luk
73 44 AugustoIl 26/09/2023 10:24, Luc Waterschoot ha scritto:
Good Afternoon,
I have checked the logs I did upload these times: all is correct.Thus the Top Operator statistic for 2010 is completely wrong.
Probably also for the hunters, as we had no activations in 2010 at all.For 2011, the only activations are by I2AE and this is also wrong as we had alo 1 activation by DL1EKO and 2 activations on the same Ref by HB9WFF.
For this reason we believe that also the “all years” statistics may be wrong! And for this, also some Award may have been issued wrongly.
I also checked the refs activated by those activators, with LogSearch: strangely, it gives correct results for 2011.
I would please the concerned manager to correct these pages, and write mere if the other years statistics are corrected, so we may issue the top operators yearly awards.
Many thanks!
Augusto HB9TZA WWFF HBFF NCHello Staff,
Habsruedi HB9AGO wrote me that the wrong Log in HBFF-0308 is still there and the right activation in HBFF-0259 is not in the Database.I guess it can be erased the wrong log in HBFF-0308; in that case I could upload again the right log in the HBFF-0259; let me pleaese know if I can do that.
Many thanks fronm Augusto HB9TZA and Hansruedi HB9AGO
HB9AGP wrote: WWFF hat den Fehler bei HBFF-0259 vom 20.07.2023 noch nicht korrigiert. Meine Aktivität vom Schauenberg, HBFF-0259, wurde wegen dem Fehler im GMA-Adif-File bei HBFF-0308 gutgeschrieben. Darf ich Dich bitten, diesen Fehler bei WWFF korrigieren zu lassen.Vielen Dank.
Hello Luk,
Something has changed on the HBFF National Program: in the page of the National Awards,
under the icon of HBFF stand:
… <omissis> …
Logmanager : HB9TZA
Here the email address of HB9TZA now is ” hb9tza@bluewin.ch ” to be changed with the new one: ” staff@hbff.ch ” or better temporary both together ” hb9tza@bluewin.ch staff@hbff.ch .
The structure of the site and of HBFF is changing as the Castles part will be token over and managed indipendently by another ham group.
I thank you very much! 73 44,
Augusto HB9TZAAnyway Andrew, tradition or not, I see that some few operators care for it; I guess in the next edition of the HBFF Rules I will erase that tradition, ans let it be as it comes.
Personally I let free all the References I propose and find; to be the first or the last for me it is exactly the same thing.
73 44 Andrew, Tnx for the suggestion
AugustoHI Andrew,
as I pointed out, this is not a Rule, it was mandatory only with the old Committee. Now it is just a tradition that we suggest to honorate, it is a question of fair operating among friends, like all OMs should be.
Then, if one will care for this or not, it is only his affair, he’s free to adhere or not to our Traditional Values.Personally, I would prefer not to have to do with OMs that do not care for rules, do not care for nothing, they come activate and finish, they even do not send logs, or send them elsewhere. Sorrily, exists also that kind of Activator!
I prefer these Ops that BEFORE to come and activate, look for Award Informations, search and read the Rules, look for the maps and Ref Infos, and so on.Thanks for All, Andrew; 73 44 !
Augusto
